|
--
FOR COMMITTEE DISCUSSION ONLY --
1-17-02
SECRETARYS
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REGULATORY REFORM
PROPOSED
OPERATING PRINCIPLES
The
Secretarys Advisory Committee on Regulatory Reform will conduct its
meetings and deliberations in a manner consistent with the following
operating principles:
- The
Committee recognizes the need to enhance the trust of Americans
that they will be well cared for, served, and protected.
- Members
have been selected to serve on the Advisory Committee because of
their extensive knowledge and expertise. Each member will serve
on the Committee as an individual expert, not as the
representative of any particular constituency or stakeholder.
- The
breadth of issues identified in the charter will make
subcommittees advantageous and allow for fuller, more detailed
discussions. High priority issues will be identified and assigned
to subcommittees. Members will: chair the subcommittees; note
issues that apply to one or more other sub-committees and through
assigned staff, refer those issues for resolution or
coordination, as indicated; and provide progress and findings
reports and options and recommendations at each full Committee
meeting for discussion. The full Committee will make all final
decisions and recommendations.
- The
Advisory Committee must establish priorities and work
expeditiously to complete its charge. Members will make every
effort to accomplish their work by set deadlines. As necessary,
staff (through the Chair) will disseminate any information that
requires full Committee deliberation and expeditious decisions,
between scheduled meetings.
- The
Advisory Committee will seek to make decisions and develop
recommendations through a process of consensus. Consensus does
not mean that a decision must be unanimous, rather, all members
must at least "be comfortable with" the decision. In
consensus there will be no single veto authority to a decision.
If unanimity cannot be achieved, there must at least be agreement
with the decision by a "super majority" of the members,
namely 75-80%.
- The
Advisory Committee will make every effort to maximize public
input and stakeholders (including patients) input and awareness
of its deliberations. The Committee will inform advocacy groups
about how they can participate in Committee-sponsored meetings.
Meetings of the Advisory Committee will be: open to the public;
widely publicized with no less than two weeks advance notice of
the meeting date; as centrally located as possible (or provide
alternative means so that the public can participate via remote
locations); and easily accessible to the public, including
individuals with disabilities (i.e., by subway, if available, or
by other forms of public transportation). Meeting rooms will be
able to accommodate the expected audience. Meeting agendae will
generally provide for testimony by outside witnesses and public
comment. Committee agenda materials, papers, meeting transcripts,
and copies of written testimony will be available to the public.
The Committee will also consider comments submitted in response
to a Federal Register notice.
- The
Committee will integrate all existing materials associated with
the particular issue at hand to avoid re-creating the wheel
(e.g., if GAO and Congress are already working on regulatory
reform).
- Members
will make every attempt to attend and stay for the duration of
each of three Advisory Committee meetings and one or more
regional hearings. Maximum participation by Advisory Committee
members is essential Teleconferencing, webcast or other
electronic or telephonic means will be utilized to the extent
available to insure full participation of members in
sub-committee activities between full Committee meetings.
- When
engaging in public speaking, interviews with members of the
media, or discussions with health care organizations and
professionals, members should use "active listening".
Members are required to carefully delineate their personal
positions from those of the Advisory Committee. When making
public statements, members are required to include a disclaimer
that they are not speaking on behalf of the Advisory Committee,
and that their remarks should not be interpreted to represent
Advisory Committee positions or recommendations.
|